Fix the security risks that matter first
Evidence-based review for websites, applications and architectures, scoped honestly and delivered with a practical remediation path.
Security engagements
Choose the right depth of review.
Start with public exposure, examine application controls, or address trust boundaries before implementation.
Security Remediation Advisory
Turn an assessment, penetration test, audit or scanner report into an engineering plan your team can execute.
Request remediation advice- Validate and clarify findings
- Prioritise by business and engineering impact
- Define fixes and dependencies
- Create a practical remediation backlog
- Review completed fixes where agreed
Technical Data Protection Readiness
Technical privacy and engineering advice covering data inventory, collection points, access, retention, logging, encryption, minimisation and privacy-by-design controls.
This is not legal advice. Where legal interpretation is required, Nincol recommends qualified legal or privacy counsel.
A recognised evidence base.
Methods are selected to suit the asset and decision. Framework references support judgement; they do not replace it.
- OWASP ASVS 5.0
- Verifiable security requirements, review criteria and procurement language.
- OWASP Top 10:2025
- Risk awareness and client education, not a completeness claim.
- Threat modelling
- System decomposition, ranked threats, mitigations and validation.
- NIST CSF 2.0
- Governance vocabulary for organisational risk conversations.
Rules of engagement
Clear authorisation protects your organisation, your users and everyone involved in the assessment.
- No intrusive testing without written authorisation that identifies ownership, scope, techniques and timing.
- Never send passwords, API keys, private keys or production credentials through our forms.
- Production exploitation is minimised and used only where the written scope expressly permits it.
- No review can certify that a system has zero vulnerabilities.